Reposted by Rashida Tlaib
The statement criticizes AIPAC's influence on political primaries and its support for military funding to Israel, framing it as extremist and fear-based. The tone is accusatory and confrontational, aiming to challenge the characterization of AIPAC as moderate.
- The statement does not strive to do no harm, as it uses strong language like 'obscene' and 'extremist,' which can be inflammatory and polarizing. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the privacy and dignity of others, as it engages in harsh criticism and labels a group as extremist. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is accusatory and does not seek to foster dialogue. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it uses strong language and does not offer a balanced perspective. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to influence public opinion on a significant issue, but it does so in a manner that may not be responsible or constructive. [-1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.