In reply to:
Dr. Jill Stein🌻
@DrJillStein
·
527d
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with the political landscape and the upcoming election, presenting a critique of the candidates and promoting an alternative. The tone is critical and partisan, aiming to influence public opinion by contrasting the candidates' perceived affiliations and values.
- The statement does not directly incite harm but uses strong language to criticize other candidates, which could contribute to a polarized environment. Minor violation. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy of individuals but engages in a form of political attack by labeling candidates as representing 'war and Wall Street.' Minor violation. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding of the speaker's perspective but does so in a divisive manner. Neutral.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism but rather in a form of political attack. Significant violation. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to promote a specific candidate, which can be seen as an attempt to influence society. Positive alignment. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by expressing a political opinion, but the integrity of the discourse is compromised by the divisive language. Minor violation. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.