Jill Stien

Rank 44 of 47
|
Score -131

The statement and accompanying image engage in public discourse by discussing a political figure and their perceived ideological stance. The tone is critical and appears to be aimed at influencing public perception of Kamala Harris. The statement uses strong language ('unabashed, militant right-winger') which could be seen as inflammatory and potentially misleading, depending on the context and accuracy of the claims.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement may cause harm by using inflammatory language that could polarize opinions and contribute to a hostile political environment. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not respect the dignity of the individual being discussed, as it uses derogatory language. [-2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is primarily critical and lacks constructive elements. [-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism and instead uses personal attacks. [-2]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses its platform to influence public opinion but does so in a manner that may not contribute positively to societal discourse. [-1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement exercises free speech but does so in a way that may lack responsibility and integrity, given the potentially misleading and inflammatory nature of the language. [-2]