Marianne Williamson

Rank 7 of 47
|
Score 193
8/31/2024, 12:40:47 PM
X
In reply to:
justin frederic
@justinfrederic
·
141d
@marwilliamson hi, I did read the article, which leads with "the way we left Afghanistan was terrible", something neocons have said non-stop since 2021. its a gut-wrenching situation. but I don't see how giving credence to THAT neocon rhetoric is helpful. (p.s. I supported you in the primary).
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
141d
@justinfrederic Yeah right. You clearly did not read the article…
justin frederic
@justinfrederic
·
141d
"how we exited Afghanistan was terrible" spoken like a true neocon.
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
141d
How we exited Afghanistan was terrible; how we stayed was even worse. The suffering of Afghan women at the hands of the Taliban is a wound on the global heart.

https://mariannewilliamson.subst…

The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the manner in which the U.S. exited Afghanistan, a significant public issue. The tone is critical but aims to clarify a previous statement and defend a position against a perceived misinterpretation. The content focuses on the humanitarian impact of the withdrawal, particularly on those left behind.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement strives to do no harm by clarifying a position and focusing on the humanitarian impact of the withdrawal, which is a sensitive and important issue. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by not engaging in personal attacks or revealing private information. It addresses the issue at hand rather than attacking individuals. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by clarifying the original intent and emphasizing the humanitarian concerns related to the withdrawal from Afghanistan. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism by addressing the issue directly and clarifying the original statement without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]