Marianne Williamson

Rank 7 of 47
|
Score 193

The statement criticizes the Walton family, owners of Walmart, for allegedly benefiting from low wages paid to their employees, which in turn forces those employees to rely on public assistance programs. The tone is critical and accusatory, aiming to highlight perceived economic injustices and corporate practices that impact public welfare.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement aims to highlight economic injustice, which can be seen as striving to do no harm by advocating for better wages. However, it does so in a manner that could be seen as harmful to the Walton family's reputation. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does criticize a specific family, which could be seen as disrespectful to their privacy and dignity. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding of economic issues and empathy for low-wage workers, but it does so through a critical lens that may not foster compassion towards the Walton family. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it makes a direct accusation without inviting discussion or considering counterarguments. [-2]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses its platform to bring attention to societal issues related to wages and public assistance, which can be seen as using influence for societal betterment. [+2]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement exercises free speech and addresses public issues, but the responsibility and integrity of the platform could be questioned due to the accusatory tone. [+1]