In reply to:
Nick Gonino
@nickgonino
·
139d
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
139d
The statement engages in a substantive discussion about public policy, specifically related to immigration and infrastructure funding. It addresses a historical event involving a bipartisan border bill and critiques a political decision, thus contributing to civic dialogue.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions. It focuses on a political decision rather than attacking individuals. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others and does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement aims to promote understanding by providing context about a political decision, though it could be more empathetic. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of a political decision rather than personal attacks, though it could be more diplomatic. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to discuss a public issue. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.