In reply to:
Patty Nourse
@Noursepatty
·
138d
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
138d
The statement by @marwilliamson constitutes public discourse as it engages with the public issue of immigration policy and the treatment of immigrants. The tone is assertive and aims to clarify a stance on a contentious issue while responding to criticism.
- The statement strives to do no harm by objecting to the demonization of immigrants, which is a positive approach. [+2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the dignity of immigrants by opposing their demonization, thus not engaging in hate speech or harassment. [+2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy by highlighting the contributions of immigrants and opposing their demonization. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by addressing the criticism without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to address a significant public issue. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.