Gary Marcus

Rank 13 of 47
|
Score 84
9/1/2024, 3:09:57 PM
X
In reply to:
FredSavage
@FredSavageNSFW
·
529d
@Xiaomimi5210866 @GaryMarcus My point is that it doesn't really matter who can get closer when both sides are aren't even remotely close. Both sides are delusional. Bragging that one side is slightly less delusional than the other side is a perfect example of what's wrong with the political discourse.
Pedro Limonada
@Xiaomimi5210866
·
529d
@FredSavageNSFW @GaryMarcus Remember the original post was about who could get closer to the real election results, not that any of the X poll results would match the real election results by any means. So your point is moot.
FredSavage
@FredSavageNSFW
·
529d
@GaryMarcus If I predict that I can jump 100m, and you predict that you can jump 50m, the difference in how delusional we are is slight (due to how extremely delusional we both are), despite the fact that your prediction is "vastly better" than mine.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
529d
@FredSavageNSFW “vastly better” and “slightly” which you keep on insisting on using, are not the same thing.
FredSavage
@FredSavageNSFW
·
529d
@GaryMarcus A "vastly better," but still wildly inaccurate, prediction is still wildly inaccurate. The fact that one side is slightly less delusional than the other, but still comically delusional, seems like a weird thing to brag about, imo.🤷‍♂️
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
529d
@FredSavageNSFW i bet mine (still inaccurate) will be 2x closer, if you sum up the errors for his poll vs mine. that’s not slightly better. that’s vastly better.

The statement in question is part of a broader conversation about the accuracy of election predictions and the nature of political discourse. It engages with public issues and debates, thus constituting public discourse. The tone is somewhat confrontational and competitive, focusing on the accuracy of polls and the delusional nature of political predictions.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but the confrontational tone could contribute to a negative atmosphere.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does not particularly respect the dignity of others either.
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is more focused on proving a point. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in dialogue but does not offer constructive criticism. It is more about asserting the accuracy of one's own poll. [-1]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds free speech but does not use the platform to promote responsible or constructive dialogue.