The statement reports on a public figure's stance regarding an enforceable ethics code for the Supreme Court, which is a substantive public issue. The tone is neutral and informative, aiming to share a significant viewpoint from a Supreme Court Justice.
- The statement does no harm with words and actions as it neutrally reports a public figure's stance. [+2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, as it does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by sharing a relevant viewpoint on a public issue, which can foster empathy and compassion. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments; it simply reports a fact. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence for the betterment of society by informing the public about a significant issue related to judicial ethics. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly and with integrity. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.