Gary Marcus

Rank 13 of 47
|
Score 84
9/1/2024, 9:36:47 PM
X
In reply to:
Olivia P. Walker
@olivia_p_walker
·
528d
@GaryMarcus browse RFK’s page @RobertKennedyJr - it contains relevant speeches from his dad and uncle (straight from the horses mouth kind of thing)
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
528d
@olivia_p_walker Nonsense. What on earth do Trump and RFK Jr think or do what would have appealed to JFK and RFK? It’s a best a huge stretch.
Olivia P. Walker
@olivia_p_walker
·
528d
@GaryMarcus I am keenly aware of the history. And this aligns. It’s not just about their values, it is also what they said when they were alive— and what was occurring at those times public affairs wise. The Dem Party has changed.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
528d
@olivia_p_walker If you don’t realize that JFK and RFK would have been mortified by this, you need to read some history.
Olivia P. Walker
@olivia_p_walker
·
528d
@GaryMarcus Why? I love it and she’s awesome
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
528d
This tweet is disgraceful.

The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages in a substantive discussion about the alignment of contemporary political figures with historical ideals, specifically those of JFK and RFK. The tone is critical and challenges the notion that quoting historical figures equates to living up to their ideals.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to cause harm with words and actions. It is critical but not harmful. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others. It does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is more focused on critique.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism by questioning the alignment of RFK Jr. with the ideals of his father and uncle. It does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to engage in a public debate. [+1]