The statement 'So many grifters, so little time.' in response to a conversation about an animatronics company hiring women to cosplay as robots at an exhibition constitutes public discourse as it engages with a public issue related to business ethics and potentially deceptive practices.
- The statement uses a derogatory term 'grifters' which can be harmful and dismissive, thus violating the principle of striving to do no harm with words and actions. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the privacy and dignity of the individuals involved, as it labels them as 'grifters' without providing evidence or context, which can be seen as a form of cyberbullying or harassment. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. Instead, it resorts to a personal attack by calling the individuals 'grifters', which is an ad hominem argument. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.