In reply to:
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with a public issue, specifically the authenticity and impact of political figures and their campaigns. The tone is critical yet supportive of Jill Stein's truth-telling, contrasting it with perceived inauthenticity in other political figures.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but it does criticize other political figures, which could be seen as harmful depending on the context.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, as it does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy towards Jill Stein's position, but it could be more compassionate towards those it criticizes. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of political figures but does not resort to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform to express a personal opinion responsibly. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.