Marianne Williamson

Rank 10 of 47
|
Score 186
9/2/2024, 4:10:41 AM
X
In reply to:
Kev
@Kevin_T2593
·
135d
@SmallAnalytics @marwilliamson @metzgov Preach! Jill stein’s entire political career is running for elections, not actually winning and holding office.
Small, feral voices
@SmallAnalytics
·
135d
@marwilliamson @metzgov Authentic? At 73, she has run for various elected roles since 2002 and quit before end of second term of the only position she was ever elected to: Town Council member.
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
135d
@metzgov I'm not voting for Jill, but there is power in truth-telling. And Jill is telling her truth. To me that's a lot more authentic - and powerful - than shilling for corporate Dems when progressives had thought someone was something else.
bryan metzger
@metzgov
·
136d
AOC criticizes Jill Stein on Instagram, saying her Green Party presidential campaigns are “not serious” and “predatory.”

“What does this person do to grow power?”

The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages in a substantive discussion about the qualifications and impact of political figures, specifically addressing the notion that holding office is a necessary criterion for political influence and effectiveness. The tone is assertive and aims to challenge a prevailing belief by referencing historical figures who made significant contributions without holding office.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions. It is a reasoned argument that challenges a viewpoint without resorting to harmful language. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others. It does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by providing historical examples to support its argument, fostering a more nuanced view of political influence. [+2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue by addressing the argument rather than attacking individuals personally. It focuses on the ideas and plans rather than the people involved. [+2]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to contribute to a public debate with integrity. [+2]