Reposted by Jake Tapper
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with a significant public issue, namely the human impact of the conflict involving Hamas and the Israeli government. It references a specific case to highlight broader themes of empathy and the responsibilities of leadership in conflict situations.
- The statement strives to do no harm by emphasizing the humanity of Hersh Goldberg-Polin and the potential for empathy, even in dire circumstances. This aligns well with the principle. [+2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of Hersh Goldberg-Polin by presenting his parents' perspective in a respectful manner. It does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding, empathy, and compassion by highlighting the parents' hope for empathy even in the context of conflict. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It focuses on the broader issue of leadership responsibility and empathy in conflict. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- By sharing this perspective, the statement uses its influence to foster a more empathetic and understanding society, contributing to the betterment of society. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly by addressing a significant public issue with integrity. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.