In reply to:
TechAndPoliticsMila
@CityTechPol
·
526d
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
526d
The statement by @CityTechPol engages in public discourse by addressing the reliability and functioning of language models like ChatGPT. The tone is analytical and aims to explain the observed inconsistencies in ChatGPT's responses by referencing the underlying technology.
- The statement does not cause harm and aims to provide an explanation for the inconsistencies observed in ChatGPT's responses. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by explaining the context-dependent nature of language models, which can help others comprehend why such inconsistencies occur. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by providing a technical explanation rather than resorting to personal attacks or dismissive comments. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses the platform to educate others about the nature of language models, contributing positively to the discourse on AI technology. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.