The statement criticizes the performance of large language models (LLMs) in a somewhat harsh manner, calling them 'stupid' and pointing out repeated failures in a specific task. The accompanying images provide evidence of the LLM's errors in counting the occurrences of the word 'the' in the Pledge of Allegiance. The tone is critical and somewhat dismissive, focusing on the perceived inadequacies of the LLMs.
- The statement does not strive to do no harm, as it uses derogatory language ('stupid') to describe LLMs. This could be seen as harmful to the developers and researchers working on these models. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of others, particularly those involved in the development of LLMs, by using dismissive and harsh language. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it focuses on the failures of the LLMs without acknowledging the complexity of the task or the progress made in the field. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism. While it points out errors, it does so in a manner that is more mocking than helpful. Constructive criticism would involve suggesting improvements or acknowledging the challenges involved. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement does not acknowledge or correct any mistakes on the part of the speaker. It solely focuses on the mistakes of the LLMs.Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.