Gary Marcus

The statement criticizes the performance of an AI system, highlighting a perceived failure despite significant investment. The tone is critical and somewhat frustrated, aiming to draw attention to the discrepancy between investment and performance. The accompanying image provides evidence of the AI's failure to correctly complete a task, supporting the criticism.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does not directly cause harm but could be seen as harsh criticism.
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does use strong language ('Total shitshow').
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is more focused on criticism.
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement engages in criticism but does not offer constructive feedback or engage in dialogue.
5. Principle 5:

   I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.

   There is no acknowledgment or correction of mistakes in the statement.
6. Principle 6:

   I will use my influence for the betterment of society.

   The statement uses influence to highlight a perceived issue in AI development, which could be seen as aiming for betterment by calling for accountability.
7. Principle 7:

   I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.

   The statement upholds free speech but could be more responsible and constructive in its criticism.