The statement engages in public discourse by discussing the effectiveness and reliability of AI technology, a significant topic in contemporary society. The tone is critical but aligns with the broader conversation initiated by Gary Marcus, who is also critical of the current state of AI despite substantial investments.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but expresses frustration with the current state of AI technology, which is a valid critique.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, focusing on the technology rather than individuals. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by agreeing with the critique and highlighting the gap between investment and outcomes in AI. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by agreeing with the initial critique and adding to the conversation without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.