Gary Marcus

Rank 13 of 47
|
Score 84
9/2/2024, 6:23:06 PM
X
In reply to:
Monkeyspirit (monkeyspirit.bsky.social)
@Monkeyspiritart
·
524d
@GaryMarcus Hi Gary, have you written anything or have any resources to explain why otherwise extremely smart people can't see this?

I feel like I'm going insane. It's like people thinking a picture of a bird is an actual bird, and I don't see how this happens outside of willful ignorance.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
525d
ChatGPT speaks with the authority of an encyclopedia and the reliability of a Magic 8 Ball.
Riley Goodside
@goodside
·
525d
I asked ChatGPT “how many r’s in strawberry?” then ignored it and blindly replied “wrong” 35 times.

Its successive answers were 2, 1, 3, 2, 2, 3, 2, 2, 3, 3, 2, 4, 2, 2, 2, 3, 1, 2, 3, 2, 2, 3, 4, 2, 1, 2, 3, 2, 2, 3, 2, 4, 2, 3, 2, and 1.

The statement and the linked article engage in public discourse by discussing the limitations of generative AI and its impact on human cognition. The conversation critiques the reliability of AI models like ChatGPT and explores why intelligent individuals might be misled by such technology. The tone is critical but aims to foster understanding and awareness about the limitations and potential pitfalls of AI.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement and linked article strive to do no harm by raising awareness about the limitations of AI, which can prevent misuse and overreliance on such technology. [+2]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding and empathy by addressing the cognitive vulnerabilities that make people susceptible to AI's errors, encouraging a more informed and cautious approach. [+2]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism of AI technology without resorting to personal attacks, focusing on the technology's limitations rather than attacking individuals. [+2]
  4. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses its platform to better society by educating the public about the potential pitfalls of AI, encouraging critical thinking and informed decision-making. [+2]