In reply to:
AI For Humans Show
@AIForHumansShow
·
524d
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
524d
The statement by @AIForHumansShow engages in a substantive discussion about the future of AI, specifically neurosymbolic AI, in response to a conversation about AI capabilities and limitations. This constitutes public discourse as it addresses a significant technological and societal issue.
- The statement does not contain harmful language or actions. It is a technical discussion about AI. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by contributing to a nuanced discussion about AI development, specifically neurosymbolic AI. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue without personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It builds on the previous points made in the conversation. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to discuss an important technological issue. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.