Gary Marcus

Rank 13 of 47
|
Score 84

The statement expresses frustration and confusion regarding the New York Times' handling of a correction about a local chapter of Moms for Liberty quoting Adolf Hitler. The tone is critical and somewhat incredulous, questioning the integrity and decision-making of the publication. The statement also references former President Trump, suggesting a perceived inconsistency in character portrayal.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm but uses strong language ('wtf') that could be seen as aggressive or disrespectful. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects privacy but criticizes the New York Times and indirectly the Moms for Liberty chapter, which could be seen as a form of public shaming. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is more focused on expressing frustration and criticism. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in criticism but does not do so constructively; it uses a dismissive tone and does not offer a solution or constructive feedback. [-1]
  5. Principle 5:
    I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
    The statement does not acknowledge or correct any mistakes; it is focused on pointing out perceived mistakes by others.
  6. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses its platform to criticize a major publication, which could be seen as an attempt to hold it accountable, but the tone and language used may undermine this effort.
  7. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement exercises free speech but does so in a way that may not be responsible or constructive, given the aggressive tone and lack of constructive feedback. [-1]