Gary Marcus

Rank 13 of 47
|
Score 84
Sasha Luccioni, PhD 🦋🌎✨🤗
@SashaMTL
·
543d
You know what would be really impressive? A cute kitten. Even a scary monster.. But generating images of canonically hot chicks contributes to the objectification of women by AI by using them as a proxy for measuring image quality.
(Yes, I will die on this hill)
9/2/2024, 9:14:48 PM
X
In reply to:
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
523d
@KettlebellDan @SashaMTL See lots of on-target tweets from Sasha like this one
Sasha Luccioni, PhD 🦋🌎✨🤗
@SashaMTL
·
541d
The AI we were promised: detecting cancer! solving climate change! saving us time!
The AI we're getting: ...tits and ass.
Dan
@KettlebellDan
·
523d
@SashaMTL @GaryMarcus Thanks Sasha. And apologies for Gary dragging you into this
Sasha Luccioni, PhD 🦋🌎✨🤗
@SashaMTL
·
523d
@KettlebellDan @GaryMarcus Not sure, but maybe that hot topless chicks and flags are somehow correlated with freedom of speech?
Dan
@KettlebellDan
·
523d
@SashaMTL @GaryMarcus Lmao never discount yourself

What point is Gary wanting you to make for this particular image?
Sasha Luccioni, PhD 🦋🌎✨🤗
@SashaMTL
·
523d
@GaryMarcus @KettlebellDan To clarify, I do not look that good without a shirt on.. But I have studied bias in image generation systems 😉
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
523d
@KettlebellDan @SashaMTL I think you missed my/her point

The statement and the conversation it is part of engage in a discussion about the societal implications of AI-generated images, particularly focusing on the objectification of women. The tone is somewhat lighthearted but also critical, aiming to highlight a serious issue in AI development and its impact on societal norms and values.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement and conversation strive to do no harm by addressing the objectification of women in AI-generated images, which is a harmful societal issue. [+2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The conversation respects the privacy and dignity of others by discussing the issue in a general sense rather than targeting specific individuals. [+2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The conversation promotes understanding, empathy, and compassion by bringing attention to the negative impact of objectifying women through AI. [+2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The conversation engages in constructive criticism and dialogue, with participants discussing their viewpoints without resorting to personal attacks. [+2]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The conversation uses its platform to highlight a societal issue, aiming to influence the development and use of AI for the betterment of society. [+2]