The statement and image constitute public discourse as they engage with a public issue, specifically the behavior and presence of a public figure on a social media platform. The content includes a highly provocative and offensive image, which is likely intended to criticize or make a statement about the public figure in question. The response to the post is a personal attack, which further escalates the discourse.
- The statement and image violate the principle of striving to do no harm with words and actions. The use of a highly offensive and provocative image is harmful and inflammatory. (-2 points) [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement and image do not respect the privacy and dignity of others. The image is a form of cyberbullying and harassment. (-2 points) [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement and image do not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, they promote hostility and division. (-2 points) [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The response to the post is a personal attack and does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. (-2 points) [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The use of such an image and the personal attack do not use influence for the betterment of society. Instead, they contribute to a toxic and harmful discourse. (-2 points) [-2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.