Gary Marcus

Rank 13 of 47
|
Score 84
9/2/2024, 10:28:54 PM
X
In reply to:
Ellie at Common Action
@sellieyoung
·
522d
@GaryMarcus I would benefit from a rational approach to considering what kind of threat we may be seeing from social platforms to the political space and approach to addressing that.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
522d
@sellieyoung
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
542d
For those who don’t like my politics but are interested in my thoughts on AI, here’s the thing: For me, they are part of a continuum, especially now as politics and AI have become increasingly intertwined.

More than that, this feed, is, fundamentally, about coming to rational…
Ellie at Common Action
@sellieyoung
·
522d
@GaryMarcus What is the goal?
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
522d
@sellieyoung I have tried that. Am obviously not succeeding.
Ellie at Common Action
@sellieyoung
·
522d
@GaryMarcus Lead towards a better solution. Devolving the space of public rhetoric is not what we benefit from. Hope, vision, belief — these are helpful
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
522d
Fight fire with fire? Quit the platform?

I just don’t know what to do anymore.

I feel gross even being here.

The statement by @sellieyoung, 'See work by @noupside @JuliaAngwin @alondra @wiczipedia etc,' constitutes public discourse as it engages with the public issue of the impact of social platforms on the political space. The statement suggests looking at the work of specific individuals, likely experts or commentators, to gain a better understanding of the issue.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does no harm with words and actions. It is neutral and simply suggests further reading. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by directing the conversation towards the work of experts, which can foster empathy and compassion through informed dialogue. [+2]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue by providing resources for further consideration without engaging in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+2]
  4. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    By suggesting the work of experts, the statement uses influence for the betterment of society, encouraging informed and rational discourse. [+2]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly by promoting informed discussion. [+2]