Gary Marcus

Rank 13 of 47
|
Score 84
9/2/2024, 10:45:41 PM
X
In reply to:
Dr. Émile P. Torres
@xriskology
·
522d
@GaryMarcus Same. It's really hard to deal with. Twitter is increasingly useless (folks like you are what keep me here--that's pretty much it).
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
522d
Fight fire with fire? Quit the platform?

I just don’t know what to do anymore.

I feel gross even being here.
Eliot Higgins
@EliotHiggins
·
522d
Can you believe he wears that outfit!?

The statement and the associated conversation constitute public discourse as they engage with political issues and public figures. The conversation involves a series of exchanges that include political commentary, criticism, and the use of provocative imagery. The tone is critical and somewhat confrontational, reflecting dissatisfaction with the current state of the platform and political climate.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement and the associated conversation do not strive to do no harm. The use of provocative and potentially offensive imagery, such as depicting public figures in Nazi and communist uniforms, can be harmful and inflammatory. This violates the principle of doing no harm. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The conversation does not respect the privacy and dignity of others. The use of manipulated images to depict public figures in a negative light constitutes a form of harassment and cyberbullying. This violates the principle of respecting privacy and dignity. [-2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The conversation does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it uses provocative imagery and language that can deepen divisions and promote hostility. This violates the principle of promoting understanding and empathy. [-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The conversation does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. The use of ad hominem attacks and provocative imagery detracts from meaningful discussion and instead focuses on personal attacks. This violates the principle of engaging in constructive criticism and dialogue. [-2]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The conversation does not use influence for the betterment of society. The provocative and inflammatory nature of the imagery and language used can contribute to a toxic online environment and does not foster positive societal change. This violates the principle of using influence responsibly. [-2]