Gary Marcus

The statement in question is part of a larger conversation that involves public figures and addresses societal issues such as political alignment, freedom of speech, and neutrality on social media platforms. Therefore, it constitutes public discourse.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but it is part of a contentious discussion that could potentially escalate.
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, as it does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement does not actively promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is more focused on defending a position.
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement engages in dialogue but does not provide constructive criticism or avoid personal attacks. It is somewhat dismissive. [-1]
5. Principle 7:

   I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.

   The statement upholds the principle of free speech and uses the platform responsibly, though it could be more constructive. [+1]