Gary Marcus

Rank 13 of 47
|
Score 84
9/3/2024, 2:21:27 AM
X
In reply to:
Arghavan Salles, MD, PhD
@arghavan_salles
·
521d
@GaryMarcus It seems like if the people who don’t engage in the yahtzee rhetoric leave, that’ll be all that’s left. I guess that’s part of why I’ve stayed, at least so far 🤷🏻‍♀️
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
521d
Fight fire with fire? Quit the platform?

I just don’t know what to do anymore.

I feel gross even being here.
Eliot Higgins
@EliotHiggins
·
521d
Can you believe he wears that outfit!?

The statement and the preceding conversation constitute public discourse as they engage with significant political issues, including election integrity and the behavior of public figures. The conversation involves a critique of political rhetoric and the impact of staying or leaving a social media platform in the context of these issues.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement and the preceding conversation do not directly promote harm, but the use of inflammatory imagery and language can contribute to a hostile environment. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The conversation involves public figures and does not respect their dignity, engaging in cyberbullying and potentially hate speech by using derogatory imagery and language. [-2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The conversation does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it uses provocative imagery and language that can deepen divisions. [-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The conversation does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It involves personal attacks and ad hominem arguments, particularly through the use of inflammatory images. [-2]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The conversation uses its platform to influence public opinion but does so in a way that can be seen as irresponsible and lacking integrity due to the use of provocative and potentially harmful imagery. [-2]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The conversation upholds the principles of free speech but does so in a manner that can be considered irresponsible and lacking in integrity due to the inflammatory nature of the content. [-1]