Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement and the linked article constitute public discourse as they engage with the public issue of self-driving cars and their impact on road safety. The tone is satirical, aiming to provoke thought and discussion about the potential risks and benefits of autonomous vehicles.
- The statement uses satire to highlight potential dangers of self-driving cars, which could be seen as a way to raise awareness and prevent harm. However, the hyperbolic language might cause unnecessary fear.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It respects the privacy and dignity of others. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The satirical tone may not directly promote understanding, empathy, and compassion, but it does encourage critical thinking about the issue.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It critiques a technology rather than individuals. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses satire responsibly to discuss a public issue. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.