Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement engages in a substantive discussion about the capabilities and limitations of artificial intelligence (AI), particularly in relation to the Turing Test and AI's ability to perform complex tasks such as playing Go, poker, and creating art. The tone is assertive and somewhat defensive, aiming to clarify the author's stance and challenge the opposing viewpoint presented by @polynoamial. The content includes references to specific articles and historical claims about AI, contributing to the broader public discourse on AI's potential and limitations.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm; it is focused on a technical debate about AI capabilities. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, as it does not engage in personal attacks or harassment. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by referencing specific articles and historical claims, encouraging a more informed discussion about AI. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by questioning the accuracy of the opposing viewpoint and providing evidence to support its own stance. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.