In reply to:
AI Turbo dev 馃嚳馃嚘 馃枛
@AI_GPT42
路
519d
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
路
519d
The statement 'seriously doubt that鈥檚 true, but interesting if true (how would those be implemented?)' constitutes public discourse as it engages with a public issue related to AI technology and its implications. The tone is skeptical but open to discussion, and the intent appears to be to question and seek clarification on the implementation of safety guardrails in AI art.
- The statement does not cause harm and is phrased in a way that invites further discussion, adhering to the principle of doing no harm with words and actions.聽[+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by expressing doubt in a non-confrontational manner and asking for more information, which aligns with promoting understanding, empathy, and compassion.聽[+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by questioning the implementation of safety guardrails without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, adhering to the principle of constructive criticism and dialogue.聽[+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.