Cameron Williams
@Wasgo
·
519d
In reply to:
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
519d
The statement critiques the performance of AI in generating video content, specifically pointing out its failure to understand and follow prompts accurately. The tone is critical and highlights ongoing issues with AI technology, referencing past documentation of similar problems.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly but is critical of AI technology. It does not engage in harmful rhetoric.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of individuals, focusing criticism on the technology rather than people. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement aims to promote understanding of the limitations of AI technology, which can foster empathy for those affected by its shortcomings. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of AI technology, pointing out specific issues without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement references past documentation of similar problems, indicating an acknowledgment of ongoing issues and a call for improvement. [+1]Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
- By highlighting the limitations of AI technology, the statement uses its platform to advocate for betterment in AI development and understanding. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.