Gary Marcus

Rank 12 of 47
|
Score 83
9/3/2024, 3:58:26 PM
X
In reply to:
Robert Mankoff
@bob_mankoff
·
518d
@GaryMarcus Yes
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
518d
Will the idea of ChatGPT as a tutor survive careful empirical testing?

This large 1,000 student investigation suggests some short-term gains that don’t appear to stick.
Abeba Birhane
@Abebab
·
518d
"Researchers at the University of Pennsylvania found that Turkish high school students who had access to ChatGPT while doing practice math problems did worse on a math test compared with students who didn’t have access to ChatGPT." http://hechingerreport.org/kids-…

The statement 'sure, just ignore the data to the contrary. very helpful.' constitutes public discourse as it engages in a substantive debate about the efficacy of ChatGPT as a tutor, which is a public issue related to education and technology.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement is sarcastic and dismissive, which could be seen as harmful or unconstructive. It does not strive to do no harm with words and actions. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, and it respects the privacy and dignity of others. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it is dismissive and sarcastic. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It is dismissive and could be seen as a personal attack. [-1]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement does not uphold the principles of free speech responsibly and with integrity, as it is dismissive and sarcastic rather than constructive. [-1]