Reposted by Jake Tapper
The statement addresses a significant public issue, namely Holocaust revisionism, which is a form of historical negationism that can have serious societal implications. The tone is critical and the intent appears to be to highlight and condemn the spread of Holocaust revisionism by public figures.
- The statement itself does not directly cause harm but highlights harmful discourse by others. It indirectly upholds the principle by bringing attention to harmful actions.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by condemning harmful speech rather than engaging in it. It does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- By condemning Holocaust revisionism, the statement promotes understanding, empathy, and compassion for the victims of the Holocaust and their descendants.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of public figures who are spreading harmful misinformation. It does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments but focuses on the issue at hand.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to better society by calling out harmful revisionism and promoting historical accuracy.Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech by responsibly using its platform to counter harmful misinformation and promote integrity.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.