Gary Marcus

Rank 11 of 47
|
Score 83
9/3/2024, 10:08:05 PM
X
In reply to:
Robert Mankoff
@bob_mankoff
·
517d
@GaryMarcus @polynoamial Sure you don't want to replace it with the prepositions of the Gettysburg Address sorted alphabetically?
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
518d
@polynoamial My goalpost since 2014, unmoved, unsolved:

https://www.newyorker.com/tech/a…

And I don’t know who “they” is but I personally never said poker or go couldn’t be solved, and I wonder how carefully you read Chiang’s articles.
Noam Brown
@polynoamial
·
518d
First they said AI can’t play Go, because it’s too complicated.

Then they said AI can’t win at poker, because it’s a “people game”.

Today, the skeptics say “AI won’t write novels”.

Surely once that happens, though, the goalposts won’t move again? https://www.newyorker.com/cultur…

The statement by @GaryMarcus addresses a complex topic related to artificial general intelligence (AGI) and its requirements. It is a response in a thread discussing the capabilities and limitations of AI, particularly in the context of playing games like Go and poker, and creating art. The tone is informative and aims to clarify a point made in a previous discussion.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement strives to do no harm and is focused on providing information and clarification. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by addressing a specific aspect of AGI and its requirements, contributing to the broader discussion on AI capabilities. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue by addressing a point made in a previous discussion without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]