Reposted by Jake Tapper
The statement constitutes public discourse as it addresses a significant public issue: the protection of whistleblowers and the importance of passing the PRESS Act. The tone is serious and urgent, aiming to inform and persuade the audience about the necessity of legislative action to protect journalistic sources.
- The statement strives to do no harm by advocating for the protection of whistleblowers, who are often vulnerable individuals exposing wrongdoing. [+2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of whistleblowers by emphasizing the need for confidentiality, thus not engaging in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding, empathy, and compassion by highlighting the risks whistleblowers face and the importance of protecting them. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by calling for legislative action rather than attacking individuals or groups. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence for the betterment of society by advocating for the PRESS Act, which aims to protect journalistic integrity and whistleblowers. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly by advocating for legal protections that support a free press. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.