Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
Dr. Jill Stein🌻
@DrJillStein
·
518d
The statement 'This was a solid ass rebuttal. @AOC got 24 hours to respond.' refers to a conversation involving public figures and a public issue, thus constituting public discourse. The tone is informal and somewhat confrontational, indicating a challenge to @AOC to respond to a rebuttal by @DrJillStein regarding comments made about the Green Party.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but the confrontational tone could escalate tensions, which might indirectly cause harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but the confrontational tone could be seen as lacking respect for the dignity of others. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is more focused on challenging @AOC. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it instead sets a confrontational tone and could be seen as a personal attack. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principle of free speech but does not use the platform responsibly or with integrity due to its confrontational nature. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.