Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with public figures and political issues, specifically addressing the actions and statements of Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (AOC) and Jill Stein. The tone is critical and accusatory, aiming to challenge AOC's stance and actions while defending Jill Stein.
- The statement uses strong, negative language ('untrue, specious and misleading statements', 'undemocratic diatribe') which could be seen as harmful and inflammatory, thus violating the principle of striving to do no harm with words and actions. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of AOC, as it engages in a personal attack by comparing her to Nancy Pelosi in a derogatory manner. This violates the principle of respecting the privacy and dignity of others. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it fosters division and animosity, thus violating this principle. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It resorts to personal attacks and ad hominem arguments against AOC, violating this principle. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- While the statement exercises free speech, it does so irresponsibly by using inflammatory language and personal attacks, thus not upholding the principle of using one's platform responsibly and with integrity. [-2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.