Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
Dr. Jill Stein🌻
@DrJillStein
·
517d
The statement and associated content constitute public discourse as they engage with a public issue, specifically the legal actions taken by the Democratic Party against the Green Party in Georgia. The tone is confrontational and accusatory, aiming to mobilize support against the Democratic Party's actions.
- The statement uses inflammatory language ('anti-Democratic party') which could contribute to polarization and harm public discourse. This violates the principle of striving to do no harm with words and actions. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of the Democratic Party, referring to them as 'anti-Democratic' and 'Dirty Dems.' This violates the principle of respecting the privacy and dignity of others. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement aims to promote understanding and empathy for the Green Party's position, but it does so by vilifying the Democratic Party, which undermines the principle of promoting understanding, empathy, and compassion. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. Instead, it resorts to personal attacks and ad hominem arguments against the Democratic Party, violating this principle. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to mobilize support for a cause, which aligns with the principle of using influence for the betterment of society. However, the confrontational tone detracts from this positive aspect. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.