Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
Dr. Jill Stein🌻
@DrJillStein
·
517d
The statement and the linked conversation appear to engage in a public debate involving public figures and political parties, which constitutes public discourse. The tone suggests a confrontational and potentially critical discussion about the authenticity and behavior of political entities.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but the confrontational tone could contribute to a divisive atmosphere. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does involve public criticism which could affect the dignity of those involved.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it appears more focused on criticism. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it seems to lean towards personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principle of free speech but the responsible use of the platform is questionable due to the confrontational tone.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.