Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
Dr. Jill Stein🌻
@DrJillStein
·
517d
The statement engages in a public issue by questioning the actions and authenticity of a public figure, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (AOC), in the context of a broader political debate. It references a conversation about the authenticity of political figures and their alignment with establishment politics, which is a substantive public issue.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but uses a provocative tone that could be seen as inflammatory. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does question the integrity of a public figure in a potentially disrespectful manner. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is more accusatory and confrontational. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it leans towards a personal attack by questioning AOC's authenticity and motives. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement exercises free speech but does so in a manner that may not be considered responsible or with integrity due to its accusatory tone. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.