Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement addresses a public issue by discussing the political preferences of Muslim voters and the alleged response of the Democratic National Committee (DNC). It implies a critique of political strategies and actions, thus constituting public discourse.
- The statement uses inflammatory language such as 'troublemakers' and 'loving genocide,' which can be harmful and divisive. This violates the principle of striving to do no harm with words and actions. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of others by labeling individuals as 'troublemakers' and implying they support genocide. This constitutes a form of harassment and hate speech. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it uses accusatory and inflammatory language that can deepen divisions. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It uses personal attacks and ad hominem arguments against political figures and groups. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- While the statement exercises free speech, it does so irresponsibly by spreading potentially harmful and divisive rhetoric. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.