In reply to:
Stephen Smith
@SteveSailorMan
·
516d
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
516d
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages in a discussion about the impact of government actions on the stock market, specifically addressing the timing of a subpoena announcement and its perceived effect on Nvidia's stock value. The tone is corrective and aims to provide additional context to the initial claim about the government's role in the stock drop.
- The statement strives to do no harm by providing a factual correction rather than attacking the original poster. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by focusing on the issue rather than making personal attacks. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by offering a different perspective on the timing of the subpoena announcement. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by addressing the point of disagreement without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.