Gary Marcus

Rank 11 of 47
|
Score 83
9/4/2024, 2:34:57 AM
X
In reply to:
Stephen Smith
@SteveSailorMan
·
516d
@AIandDesign @GaryMarcus Yeah but partisan minds are diseased. gary is and should be above partisanship changing his principles.

This is the leading man in cognition science. He would know he was psychologically compromised by partisan thoughts and regulate them.
AI & Design (Marco)
@AIandDesign
·
516d
@SteveSailorMan @GaryMarcus He's not exactly the only person who doesn't like Elon...
Stephen Smith
@SteveSailorMan
·
516d
@GaryMarcus Gary. Did Elon hurt you? I’ve noticed a lot of negative emotions when you discuss him.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
516d
Elon Musk blinks.

The statement 'Elon has become deeply deeply partisan. I am fighting back.' is part of a broader conversation about Elon Musk's actions and their perceived partisanship. The tone of the statement is confrontational and suggests a personal commitment to counteract what the speaker perceives as partisanship. The conversation touches on public issues related to the influence of prominent figures like Elon Musk and the impact of their actions on public discourse and policy.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm but implies a negative judgment about Elon Musk's partisanship, which could contribute to a polarized discourse. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects privacy but does not fully respect the dignity of Elon Musk, as it labels him as 'deeply deeply partisan' without providing substantive evidence or context. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it takes a confrontational stance, which may hinder constructive dialogue. [-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It makes a broad assertion about partisanship without engaging in a nuanced discussion or providing specific examples. [-2]