The statement engages in a substantive discussion about the value and sustainability of NVidia's technology and market position, which constitutes public discourse. The tone is analytical and aims to provide a counterpoint to a negative assessment of NVidia's technology.
- The statement strives to do no harm by focusing on an analytical perspective rather than personal attacks. It addresses the issue of NVidia's market sustainability without resorting to derogatory language. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by clarifying that NVidia's technology is not 'junk' and explaining the challenges related to market demand and profitability. This helps foster a more nuanced view of the situation. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by addressing the points made by the previous commenter (@Wharrgarbl42) and providing a reasoned argument against the claim that NVidia's technology is 'junk.' It does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.