Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement engages in public discourse as it addresses a public figure (AOC) and discusses the implications of her comments on a public issue, specifically the characterization of a group of people who question politicians and hold them accountable.
- The statement does not appear to intend harm, but it does use charged language ('predatory', 'prey') which could be seen as inflammatory. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does involve a public figure and could be seen as a personal attack.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is more focused on defending a position and criticizing AOC's comments. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it uses a confrontational tone and could be seen as an ad hominem argument against AOC. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principle of free speech and uses the platform to express a viewpoint, but the responsibility and integrity of the language used could be questioned.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.