Reposted by Dr. Jill Steinš»
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with public issues related to political figures and their actions, specifically addressing allegations of misconduct and accountability.
- The statement does not appear to strive to do no harm, as it uses inflammatory language ('has the gall') and makes serious accusations without a balanced perspective. This could be seen as harmful.Ā [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of the individuals mentioned, as it engages in potentially defamatory remarks and could be seen as a form of harassment.Ā [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It uses a personal attack ('has the gall') and does not provide a balanced or respectful critique.Ā [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principle of free speech but does not use the platform responsibly or with integrity, as it engages in personal attacks and inflammatory language.Ā [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.