Jill Stien

Rank 44 of 47
|
Score -131

The statement and image address a highly sensitive and contentious geopolitical issue, expressing solidarity with Palestine and condemning actions by Israel. The tone is supportive of Greta Thunberg's activism and critical of Israel's actions in Gaza. The statement uses strong language, such as 'genocide,' which can be polarizing and may provoke strong reactions from different sides of the debate.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement aims to highlight a humanitarian stance, which aligns with the principle of striving to do no harm. However, the use of charged language like 'genocide' can be seen as harmful to those who may disagree or feel targeted by such terminology.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the dignity of Greta Thunberg by supporting her actions, but it could be seen as disrespectful to others who have different views on the Israel-Palestine conflict. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes empathy and compassion towards Palestinians, but it does so in a way that may alienate those who support Israel, thus not fully promoting understanding. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue and instead uses strong, accusatory language, which can hinder constructive criticism and dialogue. [-2]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses Greta Thunberg's influence to bring attention to the issue, which can be seen as using influence for societal betterment. However, the polarizing language may not foster a productive discourse. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement exercises free speech but does so in a way that may not be responsible or with full integrity, given the potential for inciting strong, divisive reactions. [-1]