The statement and accompanying image address a significant public issue, namely the protests against Columbia University's financial support for Israel and the alleged repression of pro-Palestine voices. The tone is serious and conveys a sense of urgency and activism. The content includes a description of a protest action (vandalism of the Alma Mater statue) and the broader context of the protest (opposition to the university's financial policies and support for Palestine).
Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.The statement and image could be seen as promoting harm by endorsing vandalism as a form of protest, which may not align with the principle of striving to do no harm.
 [-2]Principle 2:
I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.The statement respects the privacy and dignity of individuals by not naming or targeting specific people, but the act of vandalism itself disrespects the university's property.
 [-1]Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.The statement promotes understanding and empathy for the pro-Palestine cause but does so through a controversial and potentially divisive action.
 [+1]Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.The statement does not engage in personal attacks but does not foster constructive dialogue either, as it highlights a destructive act.
 [-1]Principle 6:
I will use my influence for the betterment of society.The statement uses its platform to bring attention to a significant societal issue, which can be seen as using influence for the betterment of society.
 [+1]Principle 7:
I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.The statement upholds the principles of free speech by highlighting a protest, but the method of protest (vandalism) raises questions about responsible use of free speech.