Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
Dr. Jill Stein🌻
@DrJillStein
·
515d
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with public issues, specifically political stances and criticisms of public figures. The tone is supportive of Jill Stein while being critical of Joe Biden and Kamala Harris, using hashtags that could be considered inflammatory.
- The use of hashtags like #Genocidejoe and #Killerkamala can be seen as harmful and inflammatory, violating the principle of striving to do no harm with words and actions. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement engages in name-calling and potentially defamatory language, which can be considered a form of harassment or hate speech, thus violating the principle of respecting the privacy and dignity of others. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it uses derogatory language rather than fostering constructive dialogue. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue but rather resorts to personal attacks and ad hominem arguments. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- While the statement exercises free speech, it does so in a manner that lacks responsibility and integrity, given the use of inflammatory language. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.