Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with the broader issue of AI integration in business products and its impact on customer trust and business models. The tone is critical and expresses dissatisfaction with AI implementations and associated cost increases.
- The statement does not strive to do no harm, as it uses strong negative language ('AI crap') which could be seen as disrespectful and dismissive. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of others, particularly the companies and their efforts, by using derogatory language ('AI crap'). [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is primarily critical without offering constructive feedback or solutions. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It is more of a personal attack on the companies' decisions rather than a reasoned argument. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.